1. Summarize the facts of the case, as presented by the prosecution. Include relevant witnesses and testimony.
Well there where many facts that the prosecution had.
2. Summarize the facts of the case, as presented by the defense. Include relevant witnesses and testimony.
I don’t think that the defense had any good facts and it was so all over the place.
3. What was the most significant piece of evidence, in your personal opinion?
I believe that the constitution was the most important evidence because, its like the rule books or the guide lines that the United States has to go by. And since the prosecution used this to there advantage in a very good way they were really able to make there case I believe 3 or 4 times better then it would have been with out it.
4. What was the most significant argument made, in your opinion?
I think that it was the McDonalds story the reason why is because one this is real life so the jury can relate to it and the second reason is because this happened before the law even has gone through so just imagine how bad its going to be when the law does go through. The prosecution side was able to make this point a lot of times and for some reason the defense was not even able I believe to answer this.
5. What do you personally believe the correct verdict should be? Do you agree with the jury? Why or why not?
I think that today the correct team won and that was the prosecution. They had more facts to back them self’s up and to be honest I as a Latino would not want to have to carry around I.D. just because I am darker then someone else. I believe that the jury choice right because this law is stupid because this I one country that is pretty much fighting the whole world that is not an American citizen. They are clearly racially profiling that is not correct for anybody at any moment or time.
I think I deserve a 47 out of 50 points because I took very good notes and stayed quite the whole time and was very aware about what was going on. But I think that I could have been a little more better in the conference room when I we were talking about the verdict.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment